10 Best OmniFocus Alternatives
Overwhelmed by OmniFocus? Compare 10 alternatives that trade complexity for clarity, AI automation, and better everyday task management.
OmniFocus is exceptionally powerful. But power comes with complexity, and some users need different trade-offs.
Let me be clear from the start: OmniFocus is a powerful task management tool designed for busy professionals, implementing GTD methodology with features like custom perspectives, tagging, and weekly reviews. It’s the gold standard for Getting Things Done practitioners and power users who need comprehensive control over complex projects.
But that power comes at a cost—users consistently report OmniFocus has a steep learning curve, and some feel it’s overly complex for simple task management. If you’re reading this, you likely fall into one of several camps: you find OmniFocus overwhelming, you want AI automation it doesn’t provide, you need cross-platform access beyond Apple devices, or you prefer a more modern design approach.
This isn’t about OmniFocus being bad—it’s about finding the right tool for your specific needs. This guide covers 10 alternatives that address OmniFocus’s specific limitations, from simpler GTD implementations to AI-powered scheduling to modern design paradigms.
What OmniFocus Does Brilliantly
Before exploring alternatives, let’s acknowledge what makes OmniFocus exceptional:
The Most Powerful GTD Implementation
OmniFocus provides powerful task management with features like forecasting, projects, and tagging that enable users to organize tasks and implement the Getting Things Done methodology. No other tool matches its depth for GTD practitioners.
Custom Perspectives
Users can create custom perspectives that filter and organize tasks based on specific criteria, adapting to fit any workflow. This flexibility is unmatched—you can slice your tasks by context, energy level, time available, or any combination you need.
Defer and Due Date Flexibility
OmniFocus understands the crucial difference between when something becomes relevant (defer date) and when it must be complete (due date). This distinction is subtle but powerful for sophisticated task management.
Review Mode
Weekly reviews make it simple to stay up to date and focused on important tasks. The dedicated review interface walks you through projects systematically, ensuring nothing falls through the cracks.
OmniAutomation
Power users can script custom workflows and automations. While not AI, it’s programmable intelligence for those willing to invest the time.
Forecast View
See your tasks and calendar events together in one intelligent view that helps you plan realistically around your commitments.
Apple Ecosystem Integration
Deep integration with macOS and iOS notifications ensures users never miss a deadline. It feels native to Apple devices in a way few apps achieve.
Reliability and Maturity
OmniFocus has been refined over many years. It’s stable, reliable, and deeply thought through.
One-Time Purchase Option
While OmniFocus is moving toward a subscription model at around $100 per year, perpetual licenses are still available for existing users alongside the subscription option.
Why People Look for OmniFocus Alternatives
Despite its strengths, users seek alternatives for specific, legitimate reasons:
1. Overwhelming Complexity
OmniFocus is feature-rich but comes with a steep learning curve, making it challenging for new users. Some reviewers note it can feel like it’s more focused on catering to micro-management fans than staying out of the way. For people who want to get started quickly, the learning investment feels excessive.
The paradox: OmniFocus’s power requires understanding projects, action groups, contexts, tags, perspectives, review modes, and defer vs. due dates. That’s a lot before you complete your first task.
2. No AI or Intelligent Automation
Everything in OmniFocus is manual. You decide when to work on each task, manually review and adjust priorities, and build your own workflows through OmniAutomation scripting. There’s no AI scheduling, no automatic prioritization, no learning or adaptation. For users accustomed to modern AI tools, this feels dated.
3. Design Feels Dated
While functional, some users feel OmniFocus’s interface hasn’t evolved much and appears outdated compared to modern productivity apps. It’s pro software with a professional aesthetic—reliable but not beautiful in the way contemporary apps are.
4. Apple-Only Platform Lock-In
OmniFocus is only available for Mac and iOS, with web companion access for existing license owners. No native Windows, Android, or standalone web access. This creates collaboration limitations and locks you into the Apple ecosystem.
5. No Energy or Capacity Awareness
OmniFocus has no concept of your energy levels or cognitive capacity. It can’t schedule demanding work during your peak hours or protect recovery time. It treats all available time as equal, ignoring that you’re a human with fluctuating capacity.
6. GTD Methodology Lock-In
OmniFocus still prides itself on sticking to GTD principles. That’s perfect if GTD is your methodology. But if you want to try other approaches—time blocking, energy-based planning, simple prioritization—OmniFocus’s architecture fights you.
7. No Automatic Task Capture
Everything requires manual entry. There’s no automatic extraction of tasks from emails, meeting notes, or other sources. Quick capture exists, but you’re still typing everything yourself.
8. Pricing Model Transition
OmniFocus subscription pricing is steep at around $100 per year for a single app, or approximately $150 for both iOS and Mac one-time purchases. Some users feel there are good alternatives available that provide similar features for more reasonable prices.
What to Look for in an OmniFocus Alternative
Your reason for switching determines which alternative makes sense:
If you want simpler GTD: Things 3, Todoist
If you want AI automation: Motion, rivva
If you need cross-platform access: Todoist, TickTick, Sunsama
If you want capacity awareness: rivva (only option)
If you want extreme customization: Amazing Marvin
If you want modern, beautiful design: Things 3, Sorted³, rivva
If you want flexibility without complexity: 2Do, TickTick, rivva
Consider what you value most:
Simplicity vs. Power: How much control do you actually need?
Manual vs. Automated: Do you want to plan everything or let AI help?
Platform needs: Apple-only or multi-platform?
Methodology: Committed to GTD or want flexibility?
Price sensitivity: Subscription vs. one-time vs. free?
The 10 Best OmniFocus Alternatives
1. rivva - AI Intelligence OmniFocus Lacks
If you appreciate OmniFocus’s power but wish it had AI scheduling and energy awareness, rivva offers a different path forward.
rivva brings modern AI intelligence to task management. Instead of manually planning everything through perspectives and reviews, you get automatic scheduling based on your actual capacity, not just calendar availability.
How it compares to OmniFocus:
OmniFocus gives you tools to plan perfectly. rivva plans for you intelligently.
What OmniFocus does brilliantly:
Comprehensive GTD implementation ✓
Custom perspectives and views ✓
Defer and due dates ✓
Review mode ✓
Deep power and flexibility ✓
What OmniFocus doesn’t do (but rivva does):
✗ No AI scheduling → rivva schedules tasks automatically around your energy
✗ No energy awareness → rivva uses wearable data to forecast capacity
✗ Complex for many users → rivva is simpler while still powerful
✗ No automatic capture → rivva extracts tasks from email automatically
✗ Static system → rivva learns and adapts throughout the day
✗ Manual planning → Nia handles orchestration proactively
Why rivva appeals to OmniFocus users:
1. Power Without Complexity
OmniFocus: Ultimate power through perspectives, contexts, custom views, and review workflows. But you must build and maintain this system.
rivva: Intelligent power through AI that handles scheduling and adaptation automatically. You get results without mastering a complex system.
2. AI Intelligence (OmniFocus Lacks)
OmniFocus: You manually plan everything. You decide when to work on each task, when to review projects, how to prioritize.
rivva: Nia (your AI assistant) handles scheduling, prioritizing, and adapting automatically. It automates what OmniFocus makes manual.
3. Capacity-Aware (OmniFocus Can’t Do)
OmniFocus: Sophisticated defer/due dates, but no awareness of your energy levels or cognitive capacity.
rivva: Schedules based on when you’re capable, not just when you’re available. Integrates with Apple Health, Oura, and Whoop to forecast your energy and schedule demanding work during cognitive peaks.
Example: You have deep work scheduled for Tuesday 2pm. OmniFocus says “This is when it’s due.” rivva says “You’ll be drained after three meetings—I’m moving this to Wednesday morning when you’ll actually be sharp.”
4. Automatic Capture (OmniFocus Requires Manual Entry)
OmniFocus: Quick capture is fast, but you’re still manually entering every task.
rivva: Automatically extracts tasks from emails—meeting follow-ups, client requests, commitments buried in messages. Lower friction, fewer missed tasks.
5. Modern Design (OmniFocus Feels Dated)
OmniFocus: Functional pro-software aesthetic that hasn’t evolved significantly.
rivva: Modern, beautiful, native iOS design with contemporary UX patterns. Premium experience for today’s expectations.
6. Proactive Adaptation (OmniFocus Is Static)
OmniFocus: You review weekly and adjust manually.
rivva: Nia continuously adapts throughout the day. When meetings run long or priorities shift, your plan adjusts automatically.
What you keep from OmniFocus:
✅ iOS-native quality and polish
✅ Apple ecosystem integration
✅ Powerful task management
✅ Thoughtful design philosophy
✅ Apple Watch support
What you trade:
⚠️ Less GTD-specific features (no perspectives, review mode)
⚠️ Less manual customization (but AI reduces the need)
⚠️ Different methodology (capacity-based vs. GTD-focused)
✅ But you gain: AI scheduling, energy awareness, automatic capture
Best for:
OmniFocus users who want intelligent automation without sacrificing quality. Perfect for professionals who appreciate power but are tired of maintaining complex manual systems.
Pricing:
Monthly: $13.99/month
Quarterly: $31.50/quarter ($10.50/month, billed quarterly)
7‑day free trial
Pros over OmniFocus:
AI scheduling (OmniFocus is 100% manual)
Capacity-aware planning (OmniFocus ignores energy levels)
Simpler to start while still powerful
Automatic task capture from email
Modern, contemporary design
Proactive adaptation (less manual maintenance)
Faster learning curve
Cons vs. OmniFocus:
Less GTD-specific features
No perspectives or elaborate custom views
Subscription only (OmniFocus offers one-time purchase)
Newer, less mature tool
Migration from OmniFocus:
rivva isn’t trying to replicate OmniFocus—it’s a different philosophy. AI intelligence over manual power. Export your key OmniFocus projects and tasks, connect your email and calendar to rivva, sync your wearable for energy forecasting, and let Nia handle what you used to manually orchestrate.
2. Things 3 - Simpler, More Elegant GTD
How it compares to OmniFocus: Things 3 offers a streamlined approach to task management using GTD principles, with simplicity and clarity over OmniFocus’s comprehensive power.
Things 3 may not be as powerful as OmniFocus, but it has all the features most users need with a much cleaner, less overwhelming interface. It’s GTD without the complexity tax.
Key differences from OmniFocus:
Dramatically simpler interface - Things 3 combines powerful features with an interface so intuitive and beautiful that using it becomes a pleasure
Lower learning curve - You can start productively immediately without studying documentation
One-time purchase model - No subscription required; sync across devices via Things Cloud at no additional cost
Award-winning design - Won Apple Design Award twice for combining productivity, simplicity, and beautiful design
Best for:
OmniFocus users who realize they don’t need all that power and want elegant simplicity. Perfect for people who love GTD but find OmniFocus overwhelming.
Pricing:
iPhone & Apple Watch: $9.99 one-time | iPad: $19.99 one-time | Mac: $49.99 one-time
Total for all platforms: ~$80 one-time
No subscription—pay once, use for years
Pros:
Clean, intuitive interface with distraction-free design
Much easier to learn than OmniFocus
Beautiful, modern aesthetic
One-time purchase (cheaper long-term than OmniFocus subscription)
Quick Entry and Type Travel for fast navigation
Excellent mobile experience
Cons:
Less powerful for complex project management than OmniFocus
No perspectives or forecast view like OmniFocus
Apple-only (like OmniFocus)
Limited reporting and analytics
3. Todoist - Cross-Platform Power User Alternative
How it compares to OmniFocus: Todoist sacrifices some of OmniFocus’s power for cross-platform availability and simplicity. It’s GTD-friendly without being GTD-specific.
If OmniFocus is a professional CAD program, Todoist is a well-designed sketch app. Less powerful, but most people don’t need CAD anyway.
Key differences from OmniFocus:
Available everywhere - Windows, Android, Web, iOS, Mac—truly cross-platform
Simpler, faster - Natural language input makes task capture instant
Much cheaper - Generous free tier, Pro at $5/month vs. OmniFocus’s higher cost
Easier collaboration - Better team features than OmniFocus
Best for:
OmniFocus users who need cross-platform access or want dead-simple task management. Perfect for people leaving Apple’s ecosystem or collaborating with non-Apple users.
Pricing:
Free: Basic tasks and projects
Pro: $5/month or $4/month (annual)
Business: $6/user/month (annual)
Much cheaper than OmniFocus
Pros:
Truly cross-platform (Windows, Android, Web)
Lightning-fast natural language entry
Generous free tier
Excellent mobile apps on all platforms
Strong team collaboration features
Lower learning curve than OmniFocus
Cons:
Less powerful perspectives than OmniFocus
No defer dates (only due dates)
Simpler project management
No review mode
Less sophisticated for complex GTD workflows
4. Motion - AI Scheduling vs. OmniFocus Manual
How it compares to OmniFocus: Motion replaces OmniFocus’s manual planning with AI that automatically schedules everything.
Where OmniFocus gives you tools to plan perfectly, Motion plans automatically for you.
Key differences from OmniFocus:
AI auto-scheduling - Motion’s AI decides when you should work on each task based on deadlines and availability
Dynamic replanning - When your schedule changes, Motion reshuffles everything automatically
All-in-one calendar - Built-in calendar and meeting scheduler (OmniFocus requires separate calendar)
Project management - Native PM features for teams
Best for:
OmniFocus users tired of manual planning who want AI automation. Good for professionals juggling many deadlines who want hands-off scheduling.
Pricing:
Individual: $19/month (annual) or $34/month (monthly)
Team: $12/user/month (annual, 3+ users)
Similar to OmniFocus subscription pricing
Pros:
AI eliminates manual planning burden
Automatic rescheduling when plans change
All-in-one (tasks + calendar + projects)
Cross-platform (iOS, Android, Web)
Strong team features
Cons:
No GTD-specific features like OmniFocus
Less manual control (AI decides scheduling)
No perspectives or custom views
Expensive compared to simpler alternatives
Steep learning curve (different from OmniFocus but still complex)
5. Amazing Marvin - Customizable Like OmniFocus, More Modern
How it compares to OmniFocus: Amazing Marvin offers extreme customization with over 94 strategies you can toggle on/off to build your own workflow. It’s as powerful as OmniFocus but more adaptable to different methodologies.
Marvin’s motto is “your productivity system, exactly how you need it”. Where OmniFocus is built for GTD, Marvin lets you build GTD, time-blocking, habit tracking, or whatever system you want.
Key differences from OmniFocus:
Extreme customization - Over 94 “strategies” you can toggle to build your own app
Cross-platform - Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android, Web
Psychology-focused - Incorporates behavioral psychology principles to help overcome procrastination
Modern interface - More contemporary design than OmniFocus
Best for:
OmniFocus power users who want similar depth with more flexibility and cross-platform access, especially those with ADHD or executive dysfunction.
Pricing:
$12/month or $8/month (annual)
50% student discount available
14-day free trial, no credit card required
Similar to OmniFocus subscription
Pros:
Customization rivals OmniFocus’s power
Cross-platform (Windows, Android, Linux)
Excellent for ADHD and executive dysfunction
Not locked into GTD methodology
Modern, flexible interface
Time tracking and Pomodoro built-in
Cons:
Runs slower than OmniFocus on both desktop and mobile
UI feels outdated on mobile despite recent updates
Overwhelming customization options initially
No one-time purchase (subscription only)
Requires investment to configure properly
6. TickTick - Feature-Rich, More Affordable
How it compares to OmniFocus: TickTick offers surprising depth at a fraction of OmniFocus’s price. It won’t match OmniFocus’s power, but it covers 80% of use cases for 20% of the cost.
Think of it as “OmniFocus Lite”—enough power for most people, much easier to use.
Key differences from OmniFocus:
Much cheaper - Premium at $2.99/month vs. OmniFocus’s $8.33+/month
Cross-platform - Windows, Android, Web, iOS, Mac
Built-in Pomodoro timer - Integrated focus sessions (OmniFocus lacks this)
Habit tracking - Track habits alongside tasks
Calendar view included - Better calendar integration than OmniFocus
Best for:
Budget-conscious OmniFocus users who want solid task management across all platforms. Perfect for people who don’t need OmniFocus’s full power.
Pricing:
Free: Up to 9 lists with 99 tasks each
Premium: $35.99/year or $2.99/month
Much cheaper than OmniFocus while offering more features than many competitors
Pros:
Excellent price-to-feature ratio
True cross-platform availability
Built-in Pomodoro and habit tracking
Calendar view for time-blocking
Natural language input
Generous free tier
Cons:
Less powerful perspectives than OmniFocus
Simpler project management
No defer dates
Less sophisticated for complex GTD
Interface less polished than OmniFocus
7. 2Do - Powerful, More Accessible Than OmniFocus
How it compares to OmniFocus: 2Do offers similar power to OmniFocus with more flexibility and better cross-platform support, but less GTD-specific optimization.
It’s the middle ground between OmniFocus’s power and Things 3’s simplicity.
Key differences from OmniFocus:
Flexible methodology - Not locked into GTD; supports multiple workflows
Android support - Available on Android (OmniFocus isn’t)
More affordable - One-time purchases cheaper than OmniFocus
Powerful without overwhelming - Complex features hidden until needed
Best for:
OmniFocus power users who need Android access or want flexibility beyond pure GTD. Good for sophisticated users who don’t want to commit to one methodology.
Pricing:
iOS: $9.99 one-time
Mac: $49.99 one-time
Android: One-time purchase
Cheaper than OmniFocus for multi-platform
Pros:
Powerful task management rivals OmniFocus
Cross-platform including Android
Flexible methodology (not GTD-locked)
One-time purchase model
Deep features when needed
Good balance of power and accessibility
Cons:
Less elegant than Things 3 or OmniFocus
Smaller user community than major alternatives
Less frequent updates than OmniFocus
Not as GTD-optimized if that’s your methodology
Mobile apps less polished than OmniFocus
8. Sorted³ - Modern iOS Task Management
How it compares to OmniFocus: Sorted³ takes a completely different approach—auto-scheduling tasks into your day with minimal manual planning. It’s the opposite of OmniFocus’s comprehensive control.
Where OmniFocus lets you plan everything perfectly, Sorted³ just schedules things for you automatically.
Key differences from OmniFocus:
Auto-scheduling - Sorted³ automatically fits tasks into your day
Time-blocking focus - Visual timeline of your entire day
Modern design - Contemporary iOS interface vs. OmniFocus’s dated aesthetic
Simpler approach - Much less complexity than OmniFocus
Best for:
OmniFocus users who want modern design and automatic scheduling without manual planning complexity. Good for people who found OmniFocus too overwhelming.
Pricing:
Free: Basic features
Pro: $14.99/year
Much cheaper than OmniFocus
Pros:
Beautiful, modern iOS-native design
Auto-scheduling reduces planning burden
Visual time-blocking interface
Much simpler than OmniFocus
Affordable pricing
Quick to learn and use
Cons:
Far less powerful than OmniFocus
iOS/Mac only (like OmniFocus)
No perspectives or custom views
Limited project management
Not suitable for complex GTD workflows
Less control than OmniFocus provides
9. Sunsama - Intentional Planning vs. Comprehensive Capture
How it compares to OmniFocus: Sunsama focuses on mindful daily planning rather than comprehensive task capture. It’s philosophically different from OmniFocus’s “capture everything” GTD approach.
Where OmniFocus helps you manage all your commitments, Sunsama helps you choose what to work on today.
Key differences from OmniFocus:
Guided planning rituals - Morning planning and evening reflection (OmniFocus has review mode, but Sunsama forces daily rituals)
Cross-platform - Web and desktop apps (OmniFocus is Apple-only)
Task consolidation - Pulls from multiple tools including pulling tasks from other systems
Intentionality focus - Prevents overcommitment vs. OmniFocus’s “capture everything”
Best for:
OmniFocus users who feel overwhelmed by comprehensive capture and want structured daily planning. Perfect for people who tend to overcommit.
Pricing:
$20/month or $16/month (annual)
14-day free trial
More expensive than OmniFocus
Pros:
Guided planning reduces overwhelm
Excellent time-boxing and calendar integration
Daily ritual creates consistency
Cross-platform (Web, desktop)
Forces realistic capacity planning
Good for chronic over-committers
Cons:
More expensive than OmniFocus
Slower workflow than quick task managers
Daily planning ritual can feel restrictive
Limited mobile app functionality
No AI automation
Less powerful for project management
10. Akiflow - Time Blocking + Task Consolidation
How it compares to OmniFocus: Akiflow solves the “too many tools” problem by consolidating tasks from everywhere—including OmniFocus if you use it—into one unified interface.
It’s less about replacing OmniFocus and more about adding a consolidation layer on top.
Key differences from OmniFocus:
Universal task inbox - Consolidates from 30+ tools including email, Slack, Notion
Keyboard-first - Power user shortcuts everywhere
Time-blocking calendar - Visual drag-and-drop scheduling
Cross-platform - Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Web
Best for:
OmniFocus users who also use many other tools and want one place to see everything. Good for consultants or professionals managing multiple systems.
Pricing:
$19/month (annual or monthly)
7-day free trial
Similar to mid-tier OmniFocus pricing
Pros:
Consolidates tasks from 30+ tools
Excellent keyboard shortcuts for power users
Strong time-blocking features
Cross-platform availability
Universal inbox approach
Can work alongside OmniFocus
Cons:
Expensive with no free tier
Still requires manual time-blocking
No AI automation like some alternatives
Complex initial setup
Doesn’t replace OmniFocus’s depth for pure task management
Can You Replicate OmniFocus Elsewhere?
The honest answer: No tool perfectly matches OmniFocus’s power.
OmniFocus’s combination of perspectives, defer dates, review mode, and deep GTD integration is unique. If you need all of that, OmniFocus remains the best choice despite its complexity.
But here’s the key question: Do you actually need all that power?
Most OmniFocus users only use 20% of its features. If you’re not using custom perspectives, if review mode feels like a chore, if you never touch defer dates—you’re maintaining complexity you don’t need.
What You Gain by Switching
Simplicity: Apps like Things 3 and Todoist are dramatically easier to use
AI automation: Motion and rivva eliminate manual planning entirely
Modern design: Things 3 and Sorted³ feel contemporary
Cross-platform access: Most alternatives work everywhere, not just Apple devices
Different methodologies: Freed from GTD if it doesn’t fit your workflow
What You Lose
Perspectives: No other tool matches OmniFocus’s custom views
Defer dates: Most alternatives only have due dates
Review mode: Dedicated project review interface is unique to OmniFocus
GTD optimization: OmniFocus understands GTD better than alternatives
Deep power: Complex workflows are harder elsewhere
The trade-off depends on what you value more: comprehensive control or simplicity, manual precision or AI automation, GTD purity or methodological flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why would I switch from OmniFocus?
The most common reasons are complexity (steep learning curve), lack of AI automation (everything is manual), Apple-only platforms (need Windows or Android), dated design (functional but not modern), or simply not needing all that power for your actual workflow.
If you spend more time maintaining your OmniFocus system than using it productively, that’s a strong signal to consider simpler alternatives.
What’s simpler than OmniFocus?
Things 3 is the simplest power-user alternative—GTD-friendly with a fraction of OmniFocus’s complexity. Todoist is even simpler and cross-platform. TickTick offers good features with easy onboarding. All three let you be productive immediately without studying documentation.
Is there an OmniFocus alternative with AI?
rivva offers capacity-aware AI scheduling that OmniFocus can’t match—it schedules tasks based on your energy levels using wearable data. Motion provides AI auto-scheduling based on deadlines and calendar availability. Both eliminate the manual planning that OmniFocus requires.
Can I use GTD without OmniFocus?
Absolutely. Things 3 implements GTD elegantly with much less complexity. Todoist supports GTD workflows well. 2Do offers GTD-friendly features with more flexibility. Many people successfully practice GTD with simpler tools—OmniFocus is the most comprehensive implementation, not the only one.
What’s the best cross-platform alternative to OmniFocus?
Todoist is the strongest cross-platform power-user alternative with Windows, Android, Web, iOS, and Mac support. TickTick offers more features at lower cost. Amazing Marvin provides OmniFocus-level customization across all platforms for users who need extreme flexibility.
Can I import my OmniFocus data to other apps?
Most alternatives can import from OmniFocus to varying degrees. Things 3, Todoist, and others support importing tasks, projects, and basic structure. However, OmniFocus-specific features like perspectives and defer dates won’t transfer. Plan for some manual reorganization when migrating.
Conclusion
OmniFocus is exceptional for power users who need comprehensive GTD implementation and are willing to invest time mastering its complexity. It remains the gold standard for sophisticated task management.
But not everyone needs that much power. If you’re finding OmniFocus overwhelming, craving AI automation, needing cross-platform access, or simply wanting a more modern approach, excellent alternatives exist:
Things 3 offers GTD elegance without complexity
Todoist provides cross-platform power at a fraction of the cost
Motion delivers AI scheduling that OmniFocus can’t match
Amazing Marvin gives you OmniFocus-level customization with modern flexibility
rivva brings capacity-aware intelligence that considers your energy, not just your schedule
No tool perfectly replicates OmniFocus, but you might not need perfect replication. You need the right tool for your specific needs and working style.
If you want intelligent automation without OmniFocus’s complexity:
rivva offers a different kind of power—AI that schedules tasks around your actual capacity, automatic email task extraction, and proactive adaptation throughout your day. You keep iOS-native quality while gaining energy awareness and modern design that OmniFocus lacks.
Trade manual comprehensive control for intelligent automation that respects your human biology.
Try rivva free for 7 days and experience task management that works with your energy, not against it.